So good news! After thousands of years of agonizing over the Problem of Evil the human race finally can rest assured that it is no problem at all. The best part about this whole answer is that you can be convinced in 60 seconds or less. Let's all bow our heads and thank God for the good Christian Apologists at Stand to Reason who have provided not only this quick epistemological fix to Theodicy, but who also have quick fixes for such mind boggling questions as "Do Animals Have Souls", "Can Computers See: If yes, does this defeat Christianity", and their easy answer to the incompatibility of Homosexuals and Christianity in their compassionately titled article, "Fags Doom Nation".
I've had about all I can take of this pseudo-intellectual garbage. No wonder most of the non-christian world don't take Christians seriously. We have people like this that are giving smart people a bad name.
I'm not even going to address the latter articles I mentioned. I think the titles speak for themselves. But "60 Second Theodicy" (SST) makes me want to vomit all over myself. They don't even get the Problem of Evil right in the first place. Then they act like it is an attack on the Christian God. Uhh, NO! The Problem of evil is a problem for God! Any God! and more specifically for the classical conception of God. Why the hell do so many Christians think that the rest of the world is waging war against them? Go into any conservative church, listen to a conservative Christian Republican in our congress or watch 30 seconds of Dub-ya talking about the rest of the world and all you ever hear is war, fear, and how we need to crush it.
There solution is to get people to say that we have to be able to choose evil in order to have moral freedom. But the way they start is to get people to decide if we should have laws against homosexual behavior, premarital sex, or abortion. You change the question depending on how liberal someone is. Your supposed to get them to say no so that you can prove the supeirority of moral freedom which requires evil to exist. To make no mention of natural evil. But the problem is that these aren't even moral issues for a lot of people. Why not say Murder, or Genocide, or Torture, or Equality. Because then the whole plan takes more than sixty seconds and you can't manipulate the conversation (which was indirectly expressed as a goal in the preface to SST). So right off the bat the only way to move on is to not acknowledge the complexity of the issue at hand. Which is not surprising given the simple mindedness of so many church folks I've met, or more specifically the people who want to control those church people.
Their conclusions either didn't follow logically from their premises or their premises were so severely flawed that the only thing to do is to get rid of them forever and pass laws making it illegal for people to use such ridiculous irresponsible and un-critical premises. The title should be changed from "Sixty Second Theodicy" to "Sixty Second Non-Sequitar" or "Sixty Second Violation of Every Logical Fallacy Known to Man". Yeah, I like that. It pretty much sums up the whole web site.
I can't stand people simplifying issues like this. Not only is it "intellectually irresponsible" but I also find it to be arrogant to no end to pretend to take issues that involve so much of peoples lives and solve them in a few paragraphs or God forbid, sixty seconds. I'm so pissed about this site that I think I will start my own little Google bomb, if anyone wishes to help.
The Bomb will be: Stand to Reason, or Christian Apologetics
For the Engines: Stand To Reason, Christian Apologetics, Problem of Evil, Sixty Second Theodicy, STR.
Recent Comments